Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
graham moggeParticipant
Well done Jacs, you certainly deserve to succeed.
graham moggeParticipantSorry to butt in you two.
Results not quite so good today, level stakes first 3 meetings. 19 bets matched 7 wins so 36% + 3.5 pts
Pippins method won
Carls ” wongraham moggeParticipantMicheal, I only joined last week. Suggest you read through the main threads on here, I did and found a couple of methods that suited me. I use a bot called Betsender to place bets to criteria I give it, ie, only bet at 3.00+. I see JacM has started using one but I don`t know her methods.
graham moggeParticipantSome bug in my system….. Should read, Cant stand paper trading. This afternoons 3 meeting, 21 first rated, my bot swerved the 5.00pm race, it was running late.
So 20 bets, 9 wins, 11 losers, 45% SR. Don`t know any tipster who would match that.graham moggeParticipantWell starting to see how this works. Using 10/20p stakes, can
t stand paper trading. The 3 afternoon meeting. 21 first rated bets, my bot swerved on the 5.00pm race, it was running late. So 20 results, including 9 wins so 11 losers. 45% SR. Don
t know of any tipster to match that.
Pippin, restarted your method 4 times, it won first bet each time. Great.
Carl. I think its your method, over 2/1, restarted 3 times, won each times. Thanks, now to start increasing stakes.graham moggeParticipantHi Pippin, Been doing a lot of reading so I may have muddled some instructions, but I am using your PRS. I thought you were now using only 1st rated? Anyway I bought home the bacon with Fraser canyon, so well pleased with my start. Thanks.
graham moggeParticipantHi All, I am new here and still finding my way round the threads. Jacqeline/Others, if it helps by using a bot you can bet live with a 1pence upwards on BF. I have Betsender and it does not always give an accurate picture in simulation. Today I tried to auto. the ratings, but the races were too close together, so missed lots of races. GLA.
-
AuthorPosts