chris potterton

[chris potterton]

Hi Matt, if you don’t want people using the strategy (bet all 1st rated, or even better dutch both) don’t use it in advertising! Betinfo24 were perfectly clear that this was a strategy that could net up to £41,000 in a year. If they are nothing to do with you and used this without your permission, you need to sort that out as it is well dodgy advertising.

[chris potterton]

Sounds like several took the advice, me too, sick as the proverbial parrot!!!!

[chris potterton]

Hi Philip,
I take your point, and I am only paper trading at the moment (when I say it made me £270, its on paper only sadly) but it did achieve another winning day today, making £260. The loss stop point is high at £450 (for nine bets), but I envisage starting at £5, going to £45, leaving a similar loss stop as that proposed for the 90 min method. I will paper trade for a couple of months though.
Interesting what Richard says about backing all first rated horses. Bet Info24 were definately championing it as a strategy, but maybe I will give up on that one. Once again thanks for your reply, it was appreciated, cheers Chris.

[chris potterton]

First, I am NOT knocking these ratings. I have posted a strategy on the strategy page that made me £270 yesterday. However non of my queries seem to get answered, and it seems that only a select few get answers, however I will try another one. I have been trying the l/s dutching of all first and second rated runners (except that I decided to swerve races involving odds on runners) after seeing your posts regarding the profitability of such a course of action, yet on your start page you state that you will make a loss if you back all rated horses, and you will make a loss if you back all first rated horses, so which is it? As to the ratings themselves, with a good strategy they are great, but as you say they are not tips, which has got me questioning the back all strategy. Cheers.

[chris potterton]

Took a right caning today, backing both to level stakes, glad I left odds on shots out as they all won! Five days in now, and have had one winning day, and am £37.99 down at the moment, largely due to losing £24.51 today. Onwards and hopefully upwards, but I have a feeling I might do better leaving maiden races alone, is there any historical data on this?

[chris potterton]

Hi, I have started to follow the dutching to level stakes of the first and second rated horses. I dont expext to get the percentage returns advertised (but will be delirious if I do!) as I will be happy at half that. I don’t however back at all in races that have an odds on selection. I take Richards point about the £93,000 stake requirement, but this surely is part of turnover and does not equate to the betting bank required, this I cant work out, so I have started betting to £1 level stakes and will increase by £1 at a time as the profits allow. My question is this, has there ever been a day with no winners at all, and would you still bet on the odds on races on the chance that the longer priced horse winning may be long term profitable? Cheers.

[Author]

Posts